Before
"Make week 4 of my nursing pharmacology syllabus about dosage calculations."
No outcome, no learners, no evidence: the AI guesses at all three.
Faculty development workshop · 90 minutes · bring one course
Generic prompts get generic course materials. In this hands-on session you will turn a learning outcome into a prompt that drafts a syllabus section or a five-minute microlearning activity you can actually use, then check the draft before it reaches students.
An AI tool cannot know what success looks like in your course unless you tell it. When a prompt names a measurable outcome, the learners, and the evidence you will accept, the draft has something to align to, and you have something to check it against.
Work through the parts in order. The first three come from your course design; the last three shape what the AI hands back.
One measurable outcome, starting with an observable verb: explain, compare, calculate, design, critique. Avoid understand or know.
Who they are, what they already know, and anything that changes the approach: first-year, online, working adults, multilingual.
How students will show the outcome: a short answer, a worked problem, a peer critique. Ask the AI to design toward it.
The exact material you want: a syllabus week, a reading guide, a five-minute micro-lesson, three check questions.
Length, reading level, accessibility, your institution's AI and syllabus policies, and what must not be invented.
Ask the AI to map each part of its draft back to the outcome and list anything it assumed or could not verify.
Paste it into the AI tool your institution supports. Never paste student records or other protected information.
"Make week 4 of my nursing pharmacology syllabus about dosage calculations."
No outcome, no learners, no evidence: the AI guesses at all three.
"Outcome: students will be able to calculate a weight-based pediatric dose and check it against a safe range. Learners: second-year BSN students, comfortable with ratio and proportion. Evidence: five timed practice problems and one error-spotting case. Format: the week 4 entry in our syllabus template (topics, readings, activities, assessment, due dates). Constraints: under 250 words, no invented readings, mark any reading I must supply as [ADD READING]. Check: map each activity to the outcome and list your assumptions."
"Create a short lesson on writing good thesis statements."
"Good" and "short" mean different things to every reader, including the AI.
"Outcome: students will be able to revise a vague thesis into one that makes an arguable, specific claim. Learners: first-year composition students on phones between classes. Evidence: one revised thesis, checked against a three-point list. Format: a five-minute microlearning activity: a 60-word explanation, one worked example, one practice item with feedback for right and wrong answers. Constraints: reading level grade 9, no images required, works without audio. Check: say which part of the activity produces the evidence."
Pick the course and the one outcome you will work on today.
Rewrite your outcome with an observable verb and a clear piece of evidence.
Use the six-part prompt to draft one week or unit, then compare drafts with a partner.
Turn the same outcome into a five-minute activity with a quick check.
Run the review checklist, fix what it finds, and share one prompt with the group.
AI drafts are a starting point. Work through this list before anything reaches students. Your progress is kept on this device when your browser allows it.
0 of 6 checked